United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 17-3795
                       ___________________________

                            United States of America

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                          v.

                                    Isaias Perez

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City
                                 ____________

                             Submitted: July 2, 2018
                               Filed: July 9, 2018
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      The district court1 imposed an above-Guidelines-range sentence upon Isaias
Perez, who violated the conditions of his supervised release. Counsel seeks

      1
      The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa.
permission to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 

(1967), challenging the reasonableness of Perez’s sentence. We affirm.

        After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in imposing a sentence above the Guidelines range. See United States v.
Miller, 

, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying a deferential
abuse-of-discretion standard to the evaluation of a revocation sentence). The record
reflects that the 36-month prison sentence and 8-year term of supervised release were
within the relevant statutory maximums, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (providing for
a maximum prison term of 5 years if the underlying offense is a Class A felony); cf.
United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 

, 933 (8th Cir. 2000) (explaining that
the maximum period of supervised release for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)
is life), and the court carefully considered and discussed the relevant section 3553(a)
factors, see United States v. White Face, 

, 740 (8th Cir. 2004).

     Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm the district court’s
judgment.
                    ______________________________




                                         -2-