Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Cornell v. Karen Anderson, 18-1038 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-1038 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1038 _ Robert Allan Cornell lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Karen Anderson; Jana Hacker; Harbans Deol; John Baldwin; James McKinney; Dawn Fulton; Michael Kane; Edward O’Brien, MD; Dian Wilder; Robin Bagby; Kristine Weitzell lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines _ Submitted: November 13, 2018 Filed: November 26, 2018 [Unpublis
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 18-1038
                     ___________________________

                            Robert Allan Cornell

                    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                       v.

Karen Anderson; Jana Hacker; Harbans Deol; John Baldwin; James McKinney;
Dawn Fulton; Michael Kane; Edward O’Brien, MD; Dian Wilder; Robin Bagby;
                             Kristine Weitzell

                   lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                   ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
                               ____________

                      Submitted: November 13, 2018
                        Filed: November 26, 2018
                              [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Iowa inmate Robert Allan Cornell appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Viewing the record in a light most
favorable to Cornell, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor, we
find that summary judgment was warranted. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 
830 F.3d 830
,
836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review; to prove deliberate indifference, inmate must
show that defendants knew of, but deliberately disregarded, serious medical need).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer