Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Latanya Blevins v. AT&T Services, Inc., 18-1107 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-1107 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1107 _ Latanya D. Blevins lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. AT&T Services, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: November 7, 2018 Filed: December 6, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination action brought under the Americans with D
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 18-1107
                       ___________________________

                                Latanya D. Blevins

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

                               AT&T Services, Inc.

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                     ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                 ____________

                         Submitted: November 7, 2018
                           Filed: December 6, 2018
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

      In this employment discrimination action brought under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), Latanya D. Blevins appeals from the order of the District
Court1 granting summary judgment to AT&T Services, Inc. After de novo review,
we conclude that the undisputed facts show that Blevins was not qualified to perform
the essential functions of her job, with or without reasonable accommodation, and
thus was not a qualified individual under the ADA. See Peterson v. Kopp, 
754 F.3d 594
, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty.
Sch. Dist., 
639 F.3d 507
, 518 (8th Cir. 2011) (listing the elements of a prima facie
case under the ADA). We affirm the judgment.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer