Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Brandon Vazquez, 18-2137 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-2137 Visitors: 30
Filed: Nov. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2137 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Brandon Vazquez lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison _ Submitted: November 15, 2018 Filed: November 27, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brandon Vazquez directly appeals after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-2137
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                                 Brandon Vazquez

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
                                 ____________

                          Submitted: November 15, 2018
                            Filed: November 27, 2018
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Brandon Vazquez directly appeals after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in
possession of a firearm, and the district court1 imposed a within-Guidelines-range

      1
      The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.
sentence. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), challenging Vazquez’s sentence on substantive and
procedural grounds. We have carefully reviewed the district court’s sentencing
decision and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Feemster, 
572 F.3d 455
, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Moreover, we have independently reviewed the
record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
488 U.S. 75
(1988), and conclude there are no
nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw.
                       ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer