Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Esnath Ochweri v. William P. Barr, 17-3731 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-3731 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3731 _ Esnath Mogiti Ochweri lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: March 27, 2019 Filed: April 8, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kenyan citizen Esnath Ochweri petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigrat
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 17-3731
                         ___________________________

                              Esnath Mogiti Ochweri

                              lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                            v.

              William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States

                             lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                            Submitted: March 27, 2019
                               Filed: April 8, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Kenyan citizen Esnath Ochweri petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from a decision in which an
immigration judge denied her motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude
the BIA’s denial was not an abuse of discretion. See Averianova v. Holder, 
592 F.3d 931
, 936-37 (8th Cir. 2010) (discussing the standard of review for motions to reopen);
8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), (ii). Accordingly, the petition is denied. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer