Filed: Jan. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1985 _ Danny R. Moore lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: January 15, 2019 Filed: January 29, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Danny Moore appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 28 U.S.C. §
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1985 _ Danny R. Moore lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: January 15, 2019 Filed: January 29, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Danny Moore appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1985
___________________________
Danny R. Moore
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: January 15, 2019
Filed: January 29, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Danny Moore appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition, in which he asserted his prior burglary convictions no longer qualified as
1
The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
career-offender predicates after Mathis v. United States,
136 S. Ct. 2243, 2257
(2016). Upon careful de novo review, see Abdullah v. Hedrick,
392 F.3d 957, 959
(8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that Moore’s claim does not entitle him to relief. See,
e.g., Martin v. United States,
904 F.3d 594, 597 (8th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-