Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charles Sokpa-Anku v. William P. Barr, 18-1997 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-1997 Visitors: 63
Filed: Apr. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1997 _ Charles Sokpa-Anku lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: April 9, 2019 Filed: April 12, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Sokpa-Anku, a citizen of Ghana who was ordered removed in 2015, petitions for
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-1997
                        ___________________________

                               Charles Sokpa-Anku

                             lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                           v.

              William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States

                            lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                      Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                             Submitted: April 9, 2019
                              Filed: April 12, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Charles Sokpa-Anku, a citizen of Ghana who was ordered removed in 2015,
petitions for review after the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied his motion
to reopen and reconsider. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse
its discretion in denying Sokpa-Anku’s motion. See Mshihiri v. Holder, 
753 F.3d 785
, 7889 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review).

      The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer