Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2453 _ Jessie Carter, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Department of Agriculture, and its representatives in their official capacity at the USDA, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: April 18, 2019 Filed: May 16, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jessie Car
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2453 _ Jessie Carter, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Department of Agriculture, and its representatives in their official capacity at the USDA, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: April 18, 2019 Filed: May 16, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jessie Cart..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2453 ___________________________ Jessie Carter, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Department of Agriculture, and its representatives in their official capacity at the USDA, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________ Submitted: April 18, 2019 Filed: May 16, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jessie Carter appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se action against the United States Department of Agriculture seeking relief under the Administrative 1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Procedures Act. Having carefully reviewed the record and Carter’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-