Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 18-2464 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-2464 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2464 _ Terrance Schrammen lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: April 2, 2019 Filed: April 5, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Terrance Schrammen appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se ac
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 18-2464
                         ___________________________

                                 Terrance Schrammen

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

                                 ConAgra Foods, Inc.

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                          for the District of Minnesota
                                  ____________

                               Submitted: April 2, 2019
                                Filed: April 5, 2019
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Terrance Schrammen appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his pro se action asserting retaliation claims against his former employer,

      1
       The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
ConAgra Foods, Inc. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary
judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kunferman v.
Ford Motor Co., 
112 F.3d 962
, 965 (8th Cir. 1997) (grant of summary judgment is
reviewed de novo; record is reviewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer