Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2637 _ Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Sergeant Jeremy Wendling lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls _ Submitted: March 8, 2019 Filed: March 13, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, federal inmate Frank Thunder-Hawk
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2637 _ Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Sergeant Jeremy Wendling lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls _ Submitted: March 8, 2019 Filed: March 13, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, federal inmate Frank Thunder-Hawk G..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2637
___________________________
Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Sergeant Jeremy Wendling
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
____________
Submitted: March 8, 2019
Filed: March 13, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, federal inmate Frank Thunder-Hawk Gallardo
appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon de
1
The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Veronica L. Duffy, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.
novo review, see Cullor v. Baldwin,
830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (summary
judgment standard of review); Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000)
(per curiam) (standard of review for dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)), we
find no merit to Gallardo’s arguments for reversal.2 The judgment is affirmed. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
2
The matters Gallardo raises for the first time in this court have not been
considered. See Stone v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to
consider pro se appellant’s new allegations and arguments).
-2-