Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2878 _ Mark Targowski lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., originally named as Super 8 Batesville, doing business as Super 8 Batesville; Larry Woods; Independence County, Arkansas lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants Zachary Lee Rawlins lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee John Does, 1-4, In their Individual and Official Capacity; S&S Hospitality 2, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants _ Appeal from U
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2878 _ Mark Targowski lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., originally named as Super 8 Batesville, doing business as Super 8 Batesville; Larry Woods; Independence County, Arkansas lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants Zachary Lee Rawlins lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee John Does, 1-4, In their Individual and Official Capacity; S&S Hospitality 2, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants _ Appeal from Un..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2878
___________________________
Mark Targowski
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., originally named as Super 8 Batesville, doing business
as Super 8 Batesville; Larry Woods; Independence County, Arkansas
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Zachary Lee Rawlins
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
John Does, 1-4, In their Individual and Official Capacity; S&S Hospitality 2, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville
____________
Submitted: September 3, 2019
Filed: September 9, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mark Targowski appeals the judgment entered by the district court1 following
a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting Fourth Amendment claims.
Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for
reversal. See Patterson v. City of Omaha,
779 F.3d 795, 801 (8th Cir. 2015)
(explaining that, when assessing the findings of the jury, this Court views the
evidence in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, assuming as true all facts that
the prevailing party’s evidence tended to prove); Craig Outdoor Advert., Inc. v.
Viacom Outdoor, Inc.,
528 F.3d 1001, 1009 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a jury verdict
is entitled to extreme deference and will not be set aside unless no reasonable jury
could have reached the same verdict based on the evidence submitted). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-2-