Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jay Monson, 18-3028 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-3028 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-3028 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jay Monson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge _ Submitted: August 7, 2019 Filed: August 19, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jay Monson appeals the district court’s1 amended judgment reducing his sentence under
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-3028
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                                     Jay Monson

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: August 7, 2019
                             Filed: August 19, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Jay Monson appeals the district court’s1 amended judgment reducing his
sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b).

      1
       The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
       We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because it does not meet
the criteria of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins, 
479 F.3d 955
, 957
(8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (jurisdiction over an appeal of a Rule 35(b) sentence is
governed by § 3742(a); dismissing for lack of jurisdiction because appeal did not
satisfy § 3742(a) criteria).

      Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer