Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wendy Nora v. IRS, 18-3095 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-3095 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-3095 _ Wendy Alison Nora lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant v. Internal Revenue Service lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: October 15, 2019 Filed: October 29, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wendy Nora appeals the district court’s1 denial of her third motion for an extension of time, and dismissal o
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-3095
                        ___________________________

                                Wendy Alison Nora

                             lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant

                                           v.

                             Internal Revenue Service

                              lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
                                    ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                         for the District of Minnesota
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: October 15, 2019
                             Filed: October 29, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Wendy Nora appeals the district court’s1 denial of her third motion for an
extension of time, and dismissal of her bankruptcy appeal for failure to comply with

      1
       The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
a court-ordered deadline. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion by denying the extension and dismissing the appeal.
See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 
536 F.3d 402
, 404 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissal for
failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court order is reviewed for abuse of
discretion); In re Harlow Fay, Inc., 
993 F.2d 1351
, 1352-53 (8th Cir. 1993) (district
court’s denial of request for extension of filing deadline in a bankruptcy appeal is
reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We
also deny Nora’s appellate motion as moot.
                         ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer