United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-3105
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                             Daevone Rashad Brown

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
                                 ____________

                          Submitted: September 5, 2019
                           Filed: September 10, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Daevone Brown appeals after he pled guilty to a felon-in-possession charge,
and the district court1 sentenced him to a prison term below the calculated United

      1
      The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) range. His counsel has moved
to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 

(1967),
suggesting the district court erred in applying an enhancement under U.S.S.G.
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), based on Brown’s possession of a firearm in connection with
another offense, namely, carrying weapons in violation of Iowa Code § 724.4(1).

      We conclude the district court properly applied the enhancement under
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). See United States v. Turner, 

, 393 (8th Cir. 2015)
(reviewing application of Guidelines de novo, and findings of fact for clear error);
United States v. Walker, 

, 452-53 (8th Cir. 2014) (affirming application
of enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) to felon in possession of firearm, who
possessed firearm in connection with violation of § 724.4(1)). In addition, having
independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 

(1988),
we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to
withdraw, and we affirm.
                      ______________________________




                                        -2-