United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 18-3339
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                                        Plaintiff - Appellee

                                          v.

                                 Gerard Cliston Ellis

                                     Defendant - Appellant
                                   ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
                                  ____________

                          Submitted: September 23, 2019
                            Filed: November 13, 2019
                                 [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Gerard Ellis pleaded guilty to distribution of 50 grams of actual
methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). The
district court 1 calculated a total offense level of 34, a criminal history category of

      1
       The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
VI, and an advisory sentencing guidelines range of 262 to 327 months. The district
court sentenced Ellis to 240 months’ imprisonment. He appeals the district court’s
conclusion that he is a career offender based on its finding that Iowa Code section
124.401 is a controlled substance offense. We review application of the career-
offender enhancement de novo. United States v. Eason, 

, 623 (8th Cir.
2011).

      Ellis’s presentence investigation report recommended a career-offender
enhancement, identifying Ellis’s two previous convictions under Iowa Code section
124.401 as controlled substance offenses. The sentencing guidelines provide that a
defendant is a career offender if he has “at least two prior felony convictions of . . .
a controlled substance offense.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a). The guidelines define a
“controlled substance offense” as “an offense under federal or state law . . . that
prohibits . . . the possession of a controlled substance . . . with intent to . . . distribute.”
§ 4B1.2(b). The definition includes “aiding and abetting . . . to commit such
offenses.” United States v. Boleyn, 

, 938 (8th Cir. 2019); U.S.S.G.
§ 4B1.2 cmt. n.1.

       We apply a categorical approach to determine whether a previous conviction
is a controlled substance offense for purposes of the career-offender enhancement.
United States v. Thomas, 

, 1275 (8th Cir. 2018). We presume that the
conviction rested on the least of the acts forbidden by the state law and determine
whether those acts would suffice for a conviction under the generic federal offense.

that Iowa’s aiding-and-abetting statute, Iowa Code section 703.1, is
broader than the generic offense, which requires intent to promote the crime, because
aiding and abetting in Iowa requires only a “knowing” mens rea.

      Since the briefs in this appeal were filed, we rejected Ellis’s argument
regarding the scope of Iowa’s aiding-and-abetting statute. See 

. In Boleyn, we held that Iowa’s aiding-and-abetting statute is “substantially
equivalent to” the generic definition and “requires more than mere ‘knowledge.’”


                                             -2-


precedent, the district court properly applied the career-offender
enhancement.

      We affirm.
                      ______________________________




                                      -3-