Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1111 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Theodore Manos lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: November 21, 2019 Filed: November 26, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shortly before Theodore Manos began serving a life term of supervised release in th
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1111 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Theodore Manos lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: November 21, 2019 Filed: November 26, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shortly before Theodore Manos began serving a life term of supervised release in the..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1111
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Theodore Manos
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: November 21, 2019
Filed: November 26, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Shortly before Theodore Manos began serving a life term of supervised release
in the District of Nebraska, he filed a motion to transfer jurisdiction over his
supervision to the District of Minnesota and to modify some conditions of his release.
The district court1 denied Manos’s motion, initially and upon reconsideration, and he
appeals.
Because Manos was not yet on supervised release when he requested a transfer
of jurisdiction and a modification of terms, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3605 (sentencing court
may transfer jurisdiction over person on supervised release to another district court
with concurrence of that court); see also United States v. Henkel,
358 F.3d 1013,
1015 (8th Cir. 2004) (noting that prisoner may apply to district court for appropriate
modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) upon release).
______________________________
1
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
-2-