Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1139 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Robert Shakir Perry lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines _ Submitted: June 11, 2019 Filed: June 12, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Robert Perry directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1139 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Robert Shakir Perry lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines _ Submitted: June 11, 2019 Filed: June 12, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Robert Perry directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1139
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Robert Shakir Perry
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: June 11, 2019
Filed: June 12, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Robert Perry directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release, and sentenced him to 8 months in prison and 46 months of supervised release.
1
The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the
sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in sentencing Perry, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or
committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States
v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); see also United
States v. White Face,
383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004); and the sentence was within
the Guidelines range, and below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(e)(3).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-