United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 19-1193
                    ___________________________

                           Daniel Bryce Hurlbut

                   lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                      v.

                  Washington County Detention Center

                         lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Sheriff Tim Helder; Karas Medical Team; Dr. Karas; Veronica Dockery; Ken
         Hughes; Landon Harris; Regina Walker; Lieutenant Foster

                  lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

                            John Doe Deputies

                         lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

       Deputy Josve Velasco; Deputy Skinkis; Deputy Uriel Paredes

                  lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
            for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                             ____________

                      Submitted: September 6, 2019
                       Filed: September 11, 2019
                             [Unpublished]
                             ____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, former inmate Daniel Bryce Hurlbut appeals
the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the record and all
reasonable inferences in Hurlbut’s favor, see Allard v. Baldwin, 

, 771
(8th Cir. 2015) (de novo review), we find no error in the district court’s thorough
analysis of Hurlbut’s claims.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                         ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
      2
        We lack jurisdiction to consider Hurlbut’s challenges to a magistrate judge’s
adverse rulings on nondispositive pretrial matters, because he did not timely object
to those orders below. See Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 

, 893 n.9 (8th
Cir. 2005) (when parties do not consent to final disposition by magistrate, this court
lacks jurisdiction to consider direct appeal of magistrate’s order on nondispositive
pretrial matter).

                                         -2-