Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1749 _ Rene D. Meyer lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Judge Craig A. Pfeifle; Judge Matthew M. Brown; Judge Heidi L. Linngren; City of Rapid City, (INC); Pennington County, (INC); Pennington County States Attorneys Office; Mark Vargo; State of South Dakota, (INC); Jason Ravnsborg, In his official capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dako
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1749 _ Rene D. Meyer lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Judge Craig A. Pfeifle; Judge Matthew M. Brown; Judge Heidi L. Linngren; City of Rapid City, (INC); Pennington County, (INC); Pennington County States Attorneys Office; Mark Vargo; State of South Dakota, (INC); Jason Ravnsborg, In his official capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakot..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1749
___________________________
Rene D. Meyer
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Judge Craig A. Pfeifle; Judge Matthew M. Brown; Judge Heidi L. Linngren; City
of Rapid City, (INC); Pennington County, (INC); Pennington County States
Attorneys Office; Mark Vargo; State of South Dakota, (INC); Jason Ravnsborg, In
his official capacity
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
____________
Submitted: January 21, 2020
Filed: January 24, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Rene Meyer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her action, claiming
violations of her rights stemming from her divorce and from state criminal
proceedings against her. After careful de novo review, we conclude that dismissal
was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seldin v. Seldin,
879 F.3d
269, 272 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)
motion); Kelly v. City of Omaha,
813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo
review of grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.
-2-