Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rene Meyer v. Judge Craig Pfeifle, 19-1749 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-1749 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1749 _ Rene D. Meyer lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Judge Craig A. Pfeifle; Judge Matthew M. Brown; Judge Heidi L. Linngren; City of Rapid City, (INC); Pennington County, (INC); Pennington County States Attorneys Office; Mark Vargo; State of South Dakota, (INC); Jason Ravnsborg, In his official capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dako
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 19-1749
                       ___________________________

                                 Rene D. Meyer

                      lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                         v.

Judge Craig A. Pfeifle; Judge Matthew M. Brown; Judge Heidi L. Linngren; City
   of Rapid City, (INC); Pennington County, (INC); Pennington County States
Attorneys Office; Mark Vargo; State of South Dakota, (INC); Jason Ravnsborg, In
                              his official capacity

                     lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
                                  ____________

                          Submitted: January 21, 2020
                            Filed: January 24, 2020
                                 [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Rene Meyer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her action, claiming
violations of her rights stemming from her divorce and from state criminal
proceedings against her. After careful de novo review, we conclude that dismissal
was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seldin v. Seldin, 
879 F.3d 269
, 272 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)
motion); Kelly v. City of Omaha, 
813 F.3d 1070
, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo
review of grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer