Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles Foster v. Department of Army, 19-1777 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-1777 Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1777 _ Charles A. Foster lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Department of Army lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 12, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Foster appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment d
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 19-1777
                        ___________________________

                                  Charles A. Foster

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                                Department of Army

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: February 4, 2020
                             Filed: February 12, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Charles Foster appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment
discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Having carefully reviewed the record

      1
       The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
and the arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Burgs v. Sissel, 
745 F.2d 526
, 528 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (reviewing sua sponte dismissal for lack
of prosecution for abuse of discretion); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer