Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Goaner Weang v. Dept of Homeland Security, 19-2111 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-2111 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-2111 _ Goaner R. Weang lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States; Peter B. Berg; Sheriff Kurt Freitag, Freeborn County Sheriff lllllllllllllllllllllRespondents - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: February 3, 2020 Filed: February 6, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, ER
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 19-2111
                        ___________________________

                                Goaner R. Weang

                      lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

                                          v.

Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; William P. Barr, Attorney General
of the United States; Peter B. Berg; Sheriff Kurt Freitag, Freeborn County Sheriff

                     lllllllllllllllllllllRespondents - Appellees
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                         for the District of Minnesota
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: February 3, 2020
                             Filed: February 6, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
      Goaner R. Weang, a citizen of South Sudan, appeals the district court’s1 order
dismissing, without prejudice, his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo
review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Zadvydas v. Davis,
533 U.S. 678
, 699, 701 (2001); Ufele v. Holder, 473 Fed. Appx. 144, 146 (3d Cir.
2012); see also Abdullah v. Hedrick, 
392 F.3d 957
, 959 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of
review). Accordingly, appellees’ motion to supplement the record is granted, and the
judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer