Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tereso Cipriano-Chacon v. William Barr, 19-2453 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-2453 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-2453 _ Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: January 14, 2020 Filed: January 17, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 19-2453
                         ___________________________

                         Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon

                             lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                           v.

                William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States

                            lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                    ____________

                            Submitted: January 14, 2020
                              Filed: January 17, 2020
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his application for
cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to prove that his removal would
result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See
8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have no jurisdiction to review this discretionary
determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I); Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 
509 F.3d 429
, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). As Cipriano-Chacon has not raised a cognizable
constitutional or legal challenge to that determination, we dismiss the petition for
review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Perez v. Holder, 
569 F.3d 370
,
372-73 (8th Cir. 2009).
                        ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer