Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-2453 _ Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: January 14, 2020 Filed: January 17, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-2453 _ Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: January 14, 2020 Filed: January 17, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2453
___________________________
Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: January 14, 2020
Filed: January 17, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his application for
cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to prove that his removal would
result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See
8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have no jurisdiction to review this discretionary
determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I); Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey,
509
F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). As Cipriano-Chacon has not raised a cognizable
constitutional or legal challenge to that determination, we dismiss the petition for
review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Perez v. Holder,
569 F.3d 370,
372-73 (8th Cir. 2009).
______________________________
-2-