United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 19-2479
                        ___________________________

                             Alexandra Noelle Hussey

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

Carol Pankow; Brianna Mehr; Natasha Jerde, formerly known as Natasha Lemler;
Maurita Christensen; Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                         for the District of Minnesota
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: February 26, 2020
                              Filed: March 2, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Alexandra Hussey appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se action.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find

      1
      The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
no basis for reversal. We conclude that dismissal was proper, see Montin v. Moore,

, 292 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review); and that there was no abuse of
discretion in the denial of her motion for recusal of the magistrate, the denial of leave
to file a second amended complaint, or the denial of her post-judgment motions,
see Liteky v. United States, 

, 555 (1994); D.M. by Bao Xiong v. Minn.
State High Sch. League, 

, 999 (8th Cir. 2019); Schriener v. Quicken
Loans, Inc., 

, 446 (8th Cir. 2014); Norman v. Ark. Dep’t of Educ., 

, 750 (8th Cir. 1996). However, we modify the dismissal of the state-law
claims to be without prejudice. See Ahmed v. United States, 

, 797 (8th
Cir. 1998) (dismissal for lack of jurisdiction should be without prejudice)

     The judgment is affirmed as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Hussey’s
motion for a transcript.
                       ______________________________




                                          -2-