Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3063 _ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dustin Michael Whitford Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: February 3, 2020 Filed: February 6, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dustin Whitford appeals a within-Guidelines-range sentence of 12 months in prison for violating the conditio
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3063 _ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dustin Michael Whitford Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: February 3, 2020 Filed: February 6, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dustin Whitford appeals a within-Guidelines-range sentence of 12 months in prison for violating the condition..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3063
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dustin Michael Whitford
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: February 3, 2020
Filed: February 6, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dustin Whitford appeals a within-Guidelines-range sentence of 12 months in
prison for violating the conditions of supervised release. He challenges the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence, and his attorney seeks permission to
withdraw.
We conclude that Whitford’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United
States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the reasonableness of
a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Perkins,
526 F.3d
1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a within-Guidelines-range sentence is
presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently
considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and
did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United
States v. Larison,
432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
______________________________
1
The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
-2-