Filed: Aug. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3669 _ Raymond Leon Semler lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy Johnston, Executive Director of MSOP, sued in their individual and official capacities; Charlie Hoffman, Vocational Work Program Director, sued in their individual and official capacities; Peter Puffer, Clinical Director, MSOP - Moose Lake, sued in their individual and official capacities; Randy Gordon, Behavior Expectation Hearing Panel, sued in their ind
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3669 _ Raymond Leon Semler lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy Johnston, Executive Director of MSOP, sued in their individual and official capacities; Charlie Hoffman, Vocational Work Program Director, sued in their individual and official capacities; Peter Puffer, Clinical Director, MSOP - Moose Lake, sued in their individual and official capacities; Randy Gordon, Behavior Expectation Hearing Panel, sued in their indi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3669
___________________________
Raymond Leon Semler
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy Johnston, Executive Director of MSOP, sued in their individual and official
capacities; Charlie Hoffman, Vocational Work Program Director, sued in their
individual and official capacities; Peter Puffer, Clinical Director, MSOP - Moose
Lake, sued in their individual and official capacities; Randy Gordon, Behavior
Expectation Hearing Panel, sued in their individual and official capacities; Julie
Sajdak, Vocational Programming Supervisor, sued in their individual and official
capacities; Paul Christensen, Vocational Programming Supervisor, sued in their
individual and official capacities; Kevin Moser, MSOP - Moose Lake Facility
Director, sued in their individual and official capacities; Tara Osborne-Leivian
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: August 24, 2020
Filed: August 27, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Raymond Semler, who is civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender
Program, appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
Upon careful de novo review, see Waters v. Madson,
921 F.3d 725, 734 (8th Cir.
2019) (standard of review), we find no error in the district court’s well-reasoned
decision. We also find no abuse of discretion in the denial of Semler’s motion to
recuse the magistrate, see In re Steward,
828 F.3d 672, 681 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard
of review).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I.
Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-