United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Eighth Circuit
                          ___________________________

                                  No. 20-1033
                          ___________________________

                                   Lonnie D. Snelling

                          lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                             v.

City of St. Louis, Missouri, a municipality; Stephen Perry, Officer, DSN #0594, in
their official capacity; Christina Powderly, Officer, DSN #0594, in theri official capacity

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

               Chris Myess, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity

                               lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

                   Martin Walls, DSN #?, in their official capacity

                         lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

   Willie Prothro, DSN #?, Necessary Party - in their official capacity; Jane Doe
        Prothro, Officer, DSN #?, Necessary Party, in their official capacity

                               lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

 John Does, Officer, DSN #?, in their official capacity; Jane Does, Officer, DSN
#?, in their official capacity; Russell Alowel, Building Inspectors, in their official
   capacity; Adebanjo Popoolas, Building Inspectors, in their official capacity;
 Stephen Perry, in his individual capacity; Christina Powderly, in her individual
capacity; Willie C. Hemphill, Jr., Individually and Owner, also known as Apostle
    Wrecking & Excacating, also known as Apostle Demolition & Excavating

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
  Ellsworth Douglas Ware, III, Agent and Individually; Jason Sengheiser, Judge,
                    Necessary Party, in his Official Capacity

                            lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

 Land Reutilization Authority, (LRA) a Municipal Corporation in its Proprietary
  Capacity; Willie C. Hemphill, Jr., Individually and Owner, doing business as
 Cheyenne Contracting; John Doe Independent Contractors, if any; Leon Reitz,
Individually and Jointly; Daniel Chamblian, DSN # unknown; Sean Lipina, DSN
#6897; Chris Myers, DSN #11332; David E. Love; Betty L. Williams, also known
 as Betty Johnson, also known as Betty L. Love; Teresa B. Morrow; Park Place
                                 Preservation LP

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                  ____________

                           Submitted: August 31, 2020
                           Filed: September 23, 2020
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Lonnie Snelling appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action raising
numerous federal and state-law claims stemming from interactions he had with

      1
        The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri.

                                         -2-
defendants regarding his property in St. Louis, Missouri, and denied his post-
judgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We review de novo
the district court’s dismissal of Snelling’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims and one of his
state-law claims. See Newcombe v. United States, 

, 917 (8th Cir. 2019);
Levy v. Ohl, 

, 991 (8th Cir. 2007). We review for an abuse of discretion
the district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Snelling’s
state-law claims as well as its denial of Snelling’s Rule 59(e) motion. See Thompson
v. Kanabec Cnty., 

, 708 (8th Cir. 2020); Rinchuso v. Brookshire Grocery
Co., 

, 730 (8th Cir. 2019). Finding no error or abuse of discretion, we
affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinions. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
                         ______________________________




                                          -3-