Filed: Oct. 04, 2021
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-2043
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jeremy Thomas Traylor
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: September 29, 2021
Filed: October 4, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Thomas Traylor appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after
he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed
1
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as
substantively unreasonable.
Having reviewed the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard
of review, see Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41, 51 (2007), we conclude the
district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. The court properly
considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that
the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or
irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors.
See United States v. Feemster,
572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); see
also United States v. Richart,
662 F.3d 1037, 1054 (8th Cir. 2011); United States v.
Lazarski,
560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009). We have independently reviewed the
record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous
issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
