Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rogan v. Cutts, 9698 (1940)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 9698 Visitors: 7
Judges: Garrecht, Haney, and Healy, Circuit Judges
Filed: Dec. 16, 1940
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 116 F.2d 800 (1940) Nat ROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Appellant, and Appellee, v. Helen Franklin CUTTS, Appellee, and Appellant. No. 9698. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 16, 1940. Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell and Armond Monroe Jewell, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for Rogan, Collector. Joseph D. Peeler, and James A. Miller, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for Helen Franklin Cutts. Before GARRECHT, HANEY,
More
116 F.2d 800 (1940)

Nat ROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Appellant, and Appellee,
v.
Helen Franklin CUTTS, Appellee, and Appellant.

No. 9698.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 16, 1940.

Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell and Armond Monroe Jewell, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for Rogan, Collector.

Joseph D. Peeler, and James A. Miller, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for Helen Franklin Cutts.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeals herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer