Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Blanco v. United States, 12508 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 12508 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 17, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 184 F.2d 117 BLANCO v. UNITED STATES. No. 12508. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. August 17, 1950. L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.
More

184 F.2d 117

BLANCO
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 12508.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 17, 1950.

L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer