Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Frank Wallace and R. M. Makemson, Doing Business as Wallace and Wallace, a Partnership, 12529 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 12529 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 20, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 185 F.2d 676 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees. No. 12529. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1950. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Dave W. Ling, Judge. H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U.S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Fruit, Attorney, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., (Joseph
More

185 F.2d 676

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace
and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees.

No. 12529.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Dave W. Ling, Judge.

H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U.S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Fruit, Attorney, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., (Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., J. Gregory Bruce and John G. Roberts, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel) for appellant.

Evans, Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Norman S. Hull, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the District Court affirmed. See United States v. Pacific Fruit and Produce Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 367, cf. Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 379.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer