Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bickford v. United States, 13812_1 (1953)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 13812_1 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 19, 1953
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 206 F.2d 395 BICKFORD v. UNITED STATES. No. 13812. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. August 19, 1953. Norvell Milbern Bickford, appellant, in propria persona. Edward W. Scruggs, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., Oliver T. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Bickford appeals from a judgment, D.C., 109 F. Supp. 154 , denying him relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which he filed on F
More

206 F.2d 395

BICKFORD
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 13812.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 19, 1953.

Norvell Milbern Bickford, appellant, in propria persona.

Edward W. Scruggs, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., Oliver T. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Bickford appeals from a judgment, D.C., 109 F. Supp. 154, denying him relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which he filed on February 6, 1953. This is his third motion on substantially the same grounds.

2

Section 2255 provides: "The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner."

3

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer