Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Albers Milling Company, a Corporation v. United States, 19-35004 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 19-35004 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 30, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 270 F.2d 36 59-2 USTC P 15,253 ALBERS MILLING COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 15869. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 30, 1959. John H. Maynard, William H. Birnie, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Carolyn R. Just, Helen A. Buckley, I. Henry Kutz, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington D.C., Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., John G. Messer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles,
More

270 F.2d 36

59-2 USTC P 15,253

ALBERS MILLING COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15869.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 30, 1959.

John H. Maynard, William H. Birnie, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Carolyn R. Just, Helen A. Buckley, I. Henry Kutz, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington D.C., Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., John G. Messer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Upon Rehearing by the full Court En Banc.

Before POPE, STEPHENS, FEE, CHAMBERS, BARNES, HAMLEY, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The opinion in Fisher Flouring Mills Company v. United States, 9 Cir., 270 F.2d 27, and the per curiam opinion in Pacific Gamble Robinson Co v. United States, 9 Cir., 270 F.2d 35, are adopted by the Court in the instant case.

2

Reversed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer