Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., a Corporation v. Audio Devices, Inc., a Corporation, 16431_1 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 16431_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 21, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 283 F.2d 695 SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a Corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 16431. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. November 21, 1960. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge. C. B. Dutton, Carl D. Overman, Indianapolis, Ind., Jacob Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal. (Dutton & Kappes, Indianapolis, Ind., Dryden, Harrington, Horgan & Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal.,
More

283 F.2d 695

SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant,
v.
AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 16431.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 21, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

C. B. Dutton, Carl D. Overman, Indianapolis, Ind., Jacob Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal. (Dutton & Kappes, Indianapolis, Ind., Dryden, Harrington, Horgan & Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal., Mason, Kolehmainen Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Richards, Watson, Birnbaum & Smith, Clifford A. Hemmerling, Los Angeles, Cal. (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., James G. Foley, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed in the case by the learned District Judge, and reported at D.C., 166 F. Supp. 250.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer