Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Theo F. Boblitt v. United States, 17088_1 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 17088_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 16, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 285 F.2d 113 Theo F. BOBLITT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 17088. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. December 16, 1960. Hersh & Hadfield, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Laurence E. Dayton, U. S. Atty., William P. Clancey, John Kaplan, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment of conviction for a violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 is reversed. The "deposit of loose t
More

285 F.2d 113

Theo F. BOBLITT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17088.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

December 16, 1960.

Hersh & Hadfield, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Laurence E. Dayton, U. S. Atty., William P. Clancey, John Kaplan, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of conviction for a violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 is reversed. The "deposit of loose timber and other materials upon the bank of a navigable water, to-wit, San Francisco Bay," was charged.

2

We are unable to convince ourselves that there is enough evidence in the record from which the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer