Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Irene Lucero v. Thomas W. Donovan, 17676_1 (1962)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 17676_1 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 05, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 300 F.2d 441 Irene LUCERO, Appellant, v. Thomas W. DONOVAN et al., Appellees. No. 17676. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. April 5, 1962. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge. Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Roger Arnebergh, City Atty. and William B. Burge, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before ORR, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The Judgment is reverse
More

300 F.2d 441

Irene LUCERO, Appellant,
v.
Thomas W. DONOVAN et al., Appellees.

No. 17676.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 5, 1962.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Atty. and William B. Burge, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The Judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court for further consideration in the light of the decision of this court in Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24, decided subsequent to the entry of judgment herein.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer