Filed: Dec. 22, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 339 F.2d 887 James B. PACKARD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 19318. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1964. Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant. Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packar
Summary: 339 F.2d 887 James B. PACKARD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 19318. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1964. Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant. Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard..
More
James B. PACKARD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19318.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1964.
Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant.
Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
