Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nitto Shosen K. K. v. William H. Johnson, Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Nitto Shosen K. K., 19633 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 19633 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 12, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 350 F.2d 399 NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellant, v. William H. JOHNSON, Appellee. CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE CO., Appellant, v. NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellee. No. 19633. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 12, 1965. Gordon K. Wright, Francis J. MacLaughlin, Lillick, Geary, McHose & Roethke, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Nitto Shosen K.K. Ben Margolis, Margolis & McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., George E. Shibley, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee, Wm. H. Johnson. Robert Sikes, Los Angeles,
More

350 F.2d 399

NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellant,
v.
William H. JOHNSON, Appellee.
CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE CO., Appellant,
v.
NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellee.

No. 19633.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 12, 1965.

Gordon K. Wright, Francis J. MacLaughlin, Lillick, Geary, McHose & Roethke, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Nitto Shosen K.K.

Ben Margolis, Margolis & McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., George E. Shibley, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee, Wm. H. Johnson.

Robert Sikes, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.

Before ORR, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We find no error in the instructions given when the charge is read as a whole. Accordingly upon both appeals judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer