Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Welton Van Hook v. R. L. Eklund, Superintendent of the California Prison at Chino, California, 19998 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 19998 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 24, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 348 F.2d 920 Welton VAN HOOK, Appellant, v. R. L. EKLUND, Superintendent of the California Prison at Chino, California, Appellee. No. 19998. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 5, 1965, Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1965. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge. Welton Van Hook, in pro. per. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Wm. E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, George J. Roth, Deputy Atty. Gen. of
More

348 F.2d 920

Welton VAN HOOK, Appellant,
v.
R. L. EKLUND, Superintendent of the California Prison at
Chino, California, Appellee.

No. 19998.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1965, Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Welton Van Hook, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Wm. E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, George J. Roth, Deputy Atty. Gen. of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, without argument;

2

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and is hereby, affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer