Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Blanche Pennymon v. United States, 21018 (1966)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 21018 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 02, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 368 F.2d 575 Blanche PENNYMON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 21018. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1966. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge. Michael Rotberg, of Boyko & Simmons, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Edwin L. Miller, U.S. Atty., Shelby Gott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES, JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The sole que
More

368 F.2d 575

Blanche PENNYMON, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21018.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.

Michael Rotberg, of Boyko & Simmons, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, U.S. Atty., Shelby Gott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The sole question raised on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the conviction below. We are convinced the evidence was sufficient to justify the conviction. We affirm.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer