Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Elco Corporation, 21298_1 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 21298_1 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 05, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 378 F.2d 62 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ELCO CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 21298. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 5, 1967. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert M. Lieber, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. John E. Carroll, Long Beach, Cal., James D. Hughes, La Mirada, Cal., for appellee. B
More

378 F.2d 62

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ELCO CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 21298.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 5, 1967.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert M. Lieber, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

John E. Carroll, Long Beach, Cal., James D. Hughes, La Mirada, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,1 District judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Had this court been called upon to pass originally on the merits of this case, we might have disagreed with the ultimate conclusion of the Board, but that is not the test for reversal. There exists in the record, in our opinion, sufficient evidence sufficiently substantial to sustain the Board's conclusion.

2

The order will be enforced.

1

Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer