Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Wayne Stroops v. United States, 21354_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 21354_1 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 05, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 405 F.2d 1211 Joseph Wayne STROOPS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 21354. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. February 5, 1969. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge. Charles T. Bumer, San Diego, Cal. (argued), for Stroops. J. Perry Langford (argued), of Langford, Langford & Lane, San Diego, Cal., for Davis. Phillip Johnson (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Edwin L. Miller, U. S. Atty., Philip W. Bumer
More

405 F.2d 1211

Joseph Wayne STROOPS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21354.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 5, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.

Charles T. Bumer, San Diego, Cal. (argued), for Stroops.

J. Perry Langford (argued), of Langford, Langford & Lane, San Diego, Cal., for Davis.

Phillip Johnson (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Edwin L. Miller, U. S. Atty., Philip W. Bumer (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty. (Stroops appeal), San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the matter remanded with instruction to the District Court to dismiss. Davis v. United States, 382 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1967).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer