Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa, 23652 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 23652 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 27, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 411 F.2d 599 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio Victor VILLAHERMOSA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 23652. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 27, 1969. Conrad Walker, San Diego, Cal., for appellant. Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U.S Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee. Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District judge. * PER CURIAM: 1 Defendant's sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. 173 is that
More

411 F.2d 599

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gregorio Victor VILLAHERMOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 23652.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 27, 1969.

Conrad Walker, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U.S Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District judge.*

PER CURIAM:

1

Defendant's sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant's prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F.2d 949, 951 (1966).

2

Affirmed.

*

Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer