Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bennie H. Hicks, and v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 23690_1 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 23690_1 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 04, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 427 F.2d 1019 Bennie H. HICKS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert H. FINCH, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee. No. 23690. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 4, 1970. Donald E. Wolfram (argued), of Goodson, Richmond & Rose, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff and appellant. Robert M. Heier (argued), Morton Hollander, Kathryn H. Baldwin, Reed Johnston, Jr., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward E. Davis, U. S. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Richard
More

427 F.2d 1019

Bennie H. HICKS, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Robert H. FINCH, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee.

No. 23690.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 4, 1970.

Donald E. Wolfram (argued), of Goodson, Richmond & Rose, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff and appellant.

Robert M. Heier (argued), Morton Hollander, Kathryn H. Baldwin, Reed Johnston, Jr., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward E. Davis, U. S. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the district court sustaining the Secretary's decision is affirmed.

2

At best, for Hicks it could be said there was a conflict in the expert medical opinions. We cannot say the Secretary's decision was not supported by substantial evidence.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer