Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joe Adelman v. United States, 25443_1 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 25443_1 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 03, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 440 F.2d 991 71-1 USTC P 15,990 Joe ADELMAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 25443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 3, 1971. Eli Grubic, Reno, Nev., Ben H. Rudnick, of Behrstock & Rudnick, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, William A. Friedlander, Ann E. Belanger, Attys., Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Magnuson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
More

440 F.2d 991

71-1 USTC P 15,990

Joe ADELMAN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 25443.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 3, 1971.

Eli Grubic, Reno, Nev., Ben H. Rudnick, of Behrstock & Rudnick, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, William A. Friedlander, Ann E. Belanger, Attys., Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Magnuson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before ELY, CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth by District Judge Gray in his 'Memorandum of Decision,' reported at 304 F. Supp. 599 (C.D.Cal.1969).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer