Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Louis Ortega v. A. Boyd Puccinelli, 26894 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 26894 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 15, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 444 F.2d 530 Louis ORTEGA, Appellant, v. A. Boyd PUCCINELLI, Appellee. No. 26894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 15, 1971. Louis Ortega, in pro. per. A. Boyd Puccinelli, in pro. per. Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The dismissal of appellant's "Petition for a Writ of Prohibition" against a bail bondsman is affirmed. 2 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), a writ of prohibition may issue only in aid of the jurisdiction of the issuing court. Stafford v.
More

444 F.2d 530

Louis ORTEGA, Appellant,
v.
A. Boyd PUCCINELLI, Appellee.

No. 26894.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 15, 1971.

Louis Ortega, in pro. per.

A. Boyd Puccinelli, in pro. per.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The dismissal of appellant's "Petition for a Writ of Prohibition" against a bail bondsman is affirmed.

2

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), a writ of prohibition may issue only in aid of the jurisdiction of the issuing court. Stafford v. Superior Court, 272 F.2d 407, 409 (9th Cir. 1959). Appellant's petition does not assert any underlying action concerning which the district court would have jurisdiction.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer