Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lee Alfred Smith, 71-2348 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 71-2348 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 20, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 451 F.2d 601 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Alfred SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2348. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1971. Barry J. Portman (argued), Deputy Federal Public Defender, John K. Van De Kamp, Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Chester L. Brown, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Division, Tom G. Kontos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los
More

451 F.2d 601

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lee Alfred SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2348.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1971.

Barry J. Portman (argued), Deputy Federal Public Defender, John K. Van De Kamp, Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Chester L. Brown, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Division, Tom G. Kontos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, CROCKER, District Judge*.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of conviction must be reversed. United States v. Andersen, 9 Cir., 1971, 447 F.2d 1063; United States v. Zaragoza, 9 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 1278.

2

Reversed. The mandate will issue forthwith, and the indictment shall be dismissed. A petition for rehearing will not be entertained.

*

Honorable M. D. Crocker, United States District Judge, Eastern District of California, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer