Filed: Feb. 15, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 455 F.2d 1088 Eric J. SCHMIDT, an individual, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WALLENIUS LINE, a corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a corporation, Defendants and Appellees. No. 25674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 15, 1972. Ernest M. Thayer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Richard E. Gutting, Jr. (argued), Gilbert C. Wheat, of Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MAD
Summary: 455 F.2d 1088 Eric J. SCHMIDT, an individual, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WALLENIUS LINE, a corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc., a corporation, Defendants and Appellees. No. 25674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 15, 1972. Ernest M. Thayer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Richard E. Gutting, Jr. (argued), Gilbert C. Wheat, of Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADD..
More
455 F.2d 1088
Eric J. SCHMIDT, an individual, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
WALLENIUS LINE, a corporation, Fred F. Noonan Company, Inc.,
a corporation, Defendants and Appellees.
No. 25674.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 1972.
Ernest M. Thayer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard E. Gutting, Jr. (argued), Gilbert C. Wheat, of Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
The order dismissing for want of diligent prosecution is affirmed. The trial court has a broad discretion in such matters and we cannot say its action was clearly erroneous.
