Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Freddie Leonard Harrold, 71-2004 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 71-2004 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 07, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 453 F.2d 752 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freddie Leonard HARROLD, Appellant. No. 71-2004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 7, 1972. James L. Brown (argued), Jerome Supkoff, of Supkoff, Brown & Michaels, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Kenneth P. Snoke, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 In v
More

453 F.2d 752

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Freddie Leonard HARROLD, Appellant.

No. 71-2004.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1972.

James L. Brown (argued), Jerome Supkoff, of Supkoff, Brown & Michaels, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Kenneth P. Snoke, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In view of the intervening decision of United States v. Bass (1971) 404 U.S. 336, 92 S. Ct. 515, 30 L. Ed. 2d 488, the judgment of conviction is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in the light of the Bass case.

2

So ordered.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer