Filed: May 26, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 456 F.2d 689 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William RANDOLPH, Jr., aka Clarence Randolph, aka Bobby Moore, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2873. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 10, 1972. Rehearing Denied May 26, 1972. Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant. Joseph L. Ward, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst. U. S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: 456 F.2d 689 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William RANDOLPH, Jr., aka Clarence Randolph, aka Bobby Moore, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2873. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 10, 1972. Rehearing Denied May 26, 1972. Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant. Joseph L. Ward, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst. U. S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
456 F.2d 689
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William RANDOLPH, Jr., aka Clarence Randolph, aka Bobby
Moore, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2873.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
April 10, 1972.
Rehearing Denied May 26, 1972.
Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant.
Joseph L. Ward, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst. U. S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.
2
We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.
3
On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph's testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
