Filed: Jul. 17, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 461 F.2d 1261 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant. No. 71-3070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 17, 1972. Donald L. Ungar (argued), Milton T. Simmons, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. William B. Shubb, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgment of conviction is affirm
Summary: 461 F.2d 1261 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant. No. 71-3070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 17, 1972. Donald L. Ungar (argued), Milton T. Simmons, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. William B. Shubb, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgment of conviction is affirme..
More
461 F.2d 1261
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 71-3070.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 17, 1972.
Donald L. Ungar (argued), Milton T. Simmons, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
William B. Shubb, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
2
We cannot conclude that the interrogation conducted by the court was improper.
3
We think there was a sufficient showing of willfulness and knowledge.
4
We conclude that the form of sentence was not permissible under Dear Wing Jung v. United States, 312 F.2d 73 (9th Cir., 1962).
5
The case is remanded for resentencing.
